20–22 Oct 2026 مؤتمر
كلية الصيدلة
Asia/Baghdad timezone

Clinical Safety of Large Language Model Responses to Simulated Iraqi Arabic Breast Cancer Scenarios and Agreement Between GPT-5.1 and Human Experts: A Multi-Phase Evaluation Study

Not scheduled
20m
كلية الصيدلة

كلية الصيدلة

Podium Presentation

Abstract

Background: Safety, triage, clinically important omissions, and communication are important when evaluating patient-facing large language models. Automated LLM-based evaluation may help scale this work, but its interpretation depends in part on how reproducibly human experts apply the reference standard.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical safety and performance of LLM responses to simulated Iraqi Arabic breast cancer scenarios, and assess agreement between GPT-5.1 and blinded human experts.
Methods: Fourteen LLM configurations each answered 50 scenarios, resulting in 700 responses across four clinical categories. GPT-5.1 evaluated each response using four 5-point domains and three binary safety-related flags. Human validation included 80 responses, independently rated by a blinded oncologist and a clinical pharmacist, and major disagreements were adjudicated by a third oncologist. Results: Weighted Cohen's kappa was 0.08–0.14, ICC(2,1) 0.09–0.14, and weighted Gwet's AC2 0.58–0.60. For binary safety-related flags, PABAK was higher (0.70–0.82). Agreement between GPT-5.1 and the final human reference for the composite score remained limited (ICC[2,1]=0.366). Estimated marginal mean final weighted scores were lowest for oncologic emergencies (48.9/100). GPT-5.1 detected all eight responses classified as unsafe by the final human reference, but also labeled 23 of 72 human-safe responses as unsafe.
Conclusions: LLM performance varied significantly, with oncologic emergencies posing the greatest difficulty. Human rating reliability also depended on both outcome assessed and the agreement metric used. GPT-5.1 showed potential as a conservative preliminary safety screener, but the false positives and the small number of unsafe responses do not support its use in autonomous clinical evaluation. Keywords: Large language models; Breast cancer; Iraqi Arabic; Clinical safety. LLM as a judge. Human evaluation.

Intend to be published in the IJPS ? NO
Has the manuscript been published not published

Primary authors

Ms Dena A. Hussein (Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq) Mrs Rasha Saer Abbood (Oncology Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad) Dr Samer Imad Mohammed (Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.